
Updated Aug 1,2007
Click on our link BLISMP for
more information.
Perspectives
Alberta Lake Water
Quality
An Overview
This issue’s guest contribution is by Ralph
Johnston, CMA
He is a councilor in the Summer Village of Itaska,
as well as Chairman of both the North East Pigeon Lake Regional Services
Commission (NEPL) and the Association of Pigeon Lake Municipalities
(Counties of Leduc, Wetaskiwin, and ten Summer Villages). He is a member of
Alberta Environment – Septage Management Committee, and teaches financial
management courses at the University of Alberta as a Certified Management
Accountant.
Introduction
Water has always been important to residents
of the Prairie Provinces and particularly Alberta. This importance has now
increased fifteen fold in the past five years as Alberta experiences a new
economic boom centered around the Tar Sands, heavy oil and now diamonds in
the North. Along with this booming economy comes population growth and
further water demand for recreational purposes. As residents of a land
locked Province, Albertans are drawn to water for a variety of domestic,
commercial, industrial and recreational purposes. In the view of the
author, lakes fit into this need equation as ‘Historical Sites’ that must be
protected in their natural state for future Albertans as they were passed on
to us.
The challenge then becomes one of preserving
“Historical Lake Sites” in harmony with Provincial and Regional growth. The
responsibly for the future of our Lakes’ water quality rests on our shift of
governance to do it correctly.
What follows is a brief overview of what
some Municipalities have done at Pigeon Lake to meet this challenge.
Phase 1 (Done)
- Built a sewage transmission
collection gravity system and treatment lagoon (Northeast Pigeon Lake
Regional Services Commission – NEPL) for the Summer Villages of Silver
Beach, Argentina Beach, Golden Days, Itaska and the Hamlet of Mulhurst
Bay.
- All respective stakeholders
signed common bylaws requiring:
- Mandatory hookup.
- Elimination of “out houses” in
the respective communities.
- Elimination of all sewage field
and septic tanks in the respective municipalities.
- All future “Development” must
be tied into the “Municipal Sewage System” at the cost of the
developer. Developer must pay an additional fee of $2700 per lot to
cover the ungranted portion of the sewage treatment original
infrastructure. This money is used to build up Commission reserves for
future expansion of facilities in the existing system and assist other
municipalities around the lake to get on a sewage treatment system.
- All ratepayers are billed by
the Commission on a monthly basis for operating costs of the system
regardless of whether the lot is vacant, occupied only in the Summer or
used all year around. One cost for all.
- All installations/connections
of the service stub to the NEPL main line will be inspected by a
Commission Inspector, ensuring that any connections to field / septic
tanks have been dismantled and the tanks and fields have been disabled
- Host of Building Code
regulations relative to sewage handling too numerous to cover at this
time but common to all member municipalities.
- NEPL system in this phase handles
the sewage of 1200 lots
- Sewage truck disposal bay built
at the lagoon site to encourage dumping sewage at the “NEPL Municipal
Lagoon” facility. There is no charge for this service to the surrounding
Pigeon Lake watershed community at this time (currently under review).
- Site access is open 24/7
however, an electronic imaging system photographs every vehicle that
enters the gate and provides real live data to the NEPL Utility Officers
computer located at the County of Wetaskiwin offices in real time.
- Working with the Department of
Environment – we have been successful in NOT issuing any
“Authorization” to dump sewage in the Pigeon Lake watershed in the
winter months. All sewage must go to the NEPL lagoon site for
processing during this period.
- It is our goal that once our
NEPL planned lagoon expansion is completed this fall of 2004 the same
guidelines will apply to the summer months as is practically possible.
- Sewage is treated and released
into a watershed that drains away from Pigeon Lake. Department of
Environment approval is required before the treated wastewater can be
released.
Next Step (Future)
When the timing and
economics are right, the NEPL would like to be part of:
- Building a sewage system on the South Side of
Pigeon lake ( Summer Villages / County of Wetaskiwin sub divisions) to
collect and transmit all sewage for treatment at the NEPL lagoon site.
- Build a sewage system in the remaining North Side communities, which
are either Summer Villages or in the County of Leduc, and transmit their
sewage for treatment at a future further expanded NEPL lagoon site.
- All Master Agreements will be common and built around what has been
developed for the North Side.
Community Vision
All stakeholders in the Pigeon Lake watershed share a
common vision - that we are entrusted with the responsibility to ensure that
Pigeon Lake remains environmentally healthy for all current and future
generations of Albertans. This has been our mandate and message to “Senior
Government” and through unity and conveying the same message, we have been
successful in obtaining the necessary grants to accomplish part of our
master objective.
Partnership
The County of Wetaskiwin, County of Leduc and the ten
Summer Villages around Pigeon Lake are working together in a Partnership
(Association of Pigeon Lake Municipalities) to accomplish this goal. NEPL
Committee members meet regularly and the Association of Pigeon Lake
Communities (APLM) meets twice a year. Water quality is always on the
Agenda. Associated with this critical item is the need to address growth
while protecting the attraction that has stimulated this growth.
Development
All respective Municipalities are development friendly
and this applies beyond waters edge to the Pigeon Lake watershed as well.
We have done the following in setting out some shared development
guidelines:
1. Prepared
a Master Development Plan for the Pigeon Lake watershed area. We are only
going to allow it to grow to a specified benchmark size of rural and urban
sized balance. The watershed must maintain its viability to sustain itself
to hold value for perpetuity as a “Historical Site”.
2. All
respective Municipalities have agreed to keep each other involved of any
development in their area of the “Watershed”.
3. Through
the “Association of Pigeon Lake Municipalities”, we meet to review progress,
resolve bottlenecks, misunderstandings and formulate strategies to move
forward in harmony with the Master Plan.
4. When
new lake subdivisions are proposed; e.g. the Community worked in harmony
with the developer to achieve this new focus on providing man made lakeside
lots. We did insist on no fields but an on-site gravity system that
collected the sewage in a large septic tank for pickup and transfer to the
NEPL lagoon for treatment.
5. On
a recent 150 acre site just off the north Shore of Pigeon Lake. Once again
the Community worked together to make this development happen. The
subdivision was approved with the condition that no septic fields would be
allowed and that each site must have a septic tank initially with an
engineered right of way for eventual hookup to a Municipal sewage system in
the future, whenever that happens. Every purchaser of this property is
aware of this obligation in his/her sale agreement.
Waste Water Disposal Regulations
Currently, Alberta is in the process of reviewing its
wastewater regulations and a planned action step to further protect lakes
and other watershed environments. While the Report is not public it is
expected that much tighter regulations, enforcement and accountability will
greatly assist a movement to further protect our water quality resources
across the Province.
Closing Remarks
I can not say enough for the leadership in the
preservation of Pigeon Lake being demonstrated firstly by the County of
Wetaskiwin and the County of Leduc in currently supporting water quality
initiatives and ready to be the lead Municipality when required. The Summer
Villages on the North side are equally committed to this vision of a non
sewage threatened lake environment.
If your lake is undeveloped or developed it is
important to first build a strategic plan involving all respective
Municipalities that addresses controlled development with protection of lake
water quality as its first priority. Your respective Councilors should be
encouraged to make this a mandate priority.
Respectfully,
Ralph B. Johnston,
Agriculture’s Role in Conservation
The
Parlby Creek – Buffalo Lake Water Management Project was started in 1985 to
provide a reliable source of water for a number of purposes. It was to
provide a reliable source of water for Alix and Mirror, stabilize the level
of water in Buffalo Lake, provide a reliable hay supply, and habitat for
fish spawning and waterfowl.
The Parlby Creek hay flats had been
a source of winter feed for area cattle for one hundred years, as well as
fish spawning habitat. With an unregulated water flow, the years varied in
their productivity of hay, fish and waterfowl. The goal of the Parlby Creek
portion of the project was to provide a more predictable supply of water
each year. Mother nature hasn’t always co-operated. Some years have had very
high water flows, and some years there has been very little winter runoff.
Management of the Parlby Creek section involves closing the control
structure gates in the late winter to enable a backflood of water over the
hay flats. Fish also use part of the area for spawning. At the end of May,
the water is drawn down to dry out the area for haying. The small fish move
down with the water into Buffalo Lake. Part of the area is hayed, and the
hay hauled off to feed area cattle. In that hay are many elements such as
phosphorus and nitrogen that would otherwise flow on into Buffalo Lake. In
the lake they would be considered pollutants and decrease the water quality.
Not everyone is always happy with
the yearly management of the Parlby Creek flats. Farmers would like optimum
haying conditions, fishermen would like shallow water for a longer period of
time to allow the fingerlings to get larger, and waterfowl people would like
more permanent water. Much of the Parlby Creek flats was and is private
land. Before the land was flooded for multiple use, land owners had to sign
flood easements. These agreements allow the land to be flooded in the
spring, with the provision that the water be drawn down to the channel by
the end of May, to enable haying the beginning of July. There is a committee
composed of environment, wildlife, and landowner representatives that meets
yearly to plan the best use for that year. Their job is to work toward the
multiple use concept, while working within the confines of the flood
easement agreements. Some people think that the flood easement agreements
should be changed to permit a later drawdown. The problem is - how? I am
sure the committee would welcome suggestions as to how to resolve the
ongoing conflict of how and when to draw down the water to best meet the
needs of all users. Until then their decisions are not always going to agree
with the wishes of any one group.
There
are a number of different aspects of conservation at work along Parlby
Creek. We are trying to conserve a natural resource for long-term gain. The
natural resource includes water, native vegetation, fish and wildlife.
Conservation in the long term means that there will be an annual harvest of
native vegetation as hay or grazing, continuing stocks of fish to be caught,
and continuing flocks of migratory waterfowl for the hunters, and that
recreational users will be able to enjoy the waters of Buffalo Lake long
into the future.
Neil
Miller, BLMT
Buffalo Lake Intermunicipal Development Plan
The Buffalo
Lake Intermunicipal Development Plan Committee is a multi-municipal
committee that is responsible for providing continuity of issues affecting
Buffalo Lake and surrounding municipalities
Established in
1996, the Committee was initially formed to guide the preparation of the
Intermunicipal Development Plan. This Plan was adopted to ensure
responsible future management of Buffalo Lake and the surrounding shoreline
area. The plan sets out land uses, future growth patterns and municipal
infrastructure and provides the framework for subsequent subdivision and
development within lakefront and backshore areas of Buffalo Lake.
The Committee
is made up of one elected official from each of the five municipalities
around the lake – Lacombe County, Camrose County, County of Stettler, and
the Summer Villages of Rochon Sands and White Sands. Administrative staff
from the five municipalities provide technical advice and support to the
Committee. Other persons are often invited to Committee meetings to provide
their input and perspective on land use and development issues. John Lund,
a longstanding member of the Buffalo Lake Management Team has attended
several meetings. His attendance has helped the Committee gain a better
understanding of the Management Team’s work, which hopefully will serve to
improve communication and coordination between the two groups.
Over the past
year, the Committee has been busy addressing issues related to major
development proposals in the
County
of Stettler. One of these proposals required an amendment to the Plan.
These discussions have led the Committee to develop a more uniform set of
development and servicing standards for residential developments. More
consistency of standards was something that had been called for when the
Plan was adopted in 1997.
The new
standards are intended to be minimum requirements with each municipality
having the discretion to impose higher standards as they deem necessary.
Among the requirements recommended by the Committee are the following: